New York Times Editorial
November 21, 2001
An Invitation to John Ashcroft
Attorney General John Ashcroft's first post-Thanksgiving priority should be explaining to Congress his plans for curbing civil liberties.
Lawmakers who have been eager to cooperate with the Bush administration's antiterrorist agenda are unnerved by the president's intention to use secret military tribunals to try terrorists. Senator Patrick Leahy, the Democrat who is chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Orrin Hatch, the committee's ranking Republican, have asked Mr. Ashcroft to appear to answer questions. The attorney general, who has ignored previous Congressional requests for details about the administration's worrisome new law enforcement policies, has now agreed to testify. The hearing is to be on Dec. 6, but Mr. Ashcroft still insists he cannot spare more than a few hours to attend.
Apart from questions about military tribunals, Mr. Leahy and his colleagues should use the opportunity to require the elusive Mr. Ashcroft to account for some of the Justice Department's other dubious departures from American principles, such as the new policy of wiretapping conversations between some prisoners and their lawyers. The government is also continuing to hold hundreds of detainees without revealing their identities, the charges being brought against them or even the reasons for such secrecy.
The Bush administration has been reluctant to either consult Congress in advance about its antiterrorism campaign, or to answer questions after the fact. Having Mr. Ashcroft publicly explain the administration's actions is an important step toward keeping the war against terrorism within constitutional bounds. But realistically, it is only a beginning. Moving toward a more balanced position on civil liberties and national security will take more than jawboning at a single hearing.
Copyright © 2001, New York Times Company. All rights reserved.
saved from url: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/21/opinion/21WED4.html
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Back to The Crime Line
Back to The Talk Line