
New York Times Editorial Florida's Crucial Vote Count Despite mounting public impatience with the delay in
determining the outcome of the presidential election, the
vote-counting process unhappily edged toward more confusion over
the weekend. The potential for new trouble was introduced by
Gov. George W. Bush, who moved in federal court to block the
manual counting of ballots in Florida. It was a puzzling step
from someone who earlier had rightly deplored the tendency
toward litigation among Democrats. The obvious way out of the
current mess is for the forces of Mr. Bush and Vice President Al
Gore to drop their actual and threatened lawsuits challenging
the validity of the ballots and the vote- counting in Florida
and other states. If counting and recounting proceed unimpeded,
we can know who the next president is by the end of the week.
Public tolerance of Mr. Bush and Mr. Gore as they jockey to
ensure an accurate count of the votes in the close election last
Tuesday is certain to be limited. Voters like the ones in Palm
Beach County who felt that the ballot misled them into voting
for Patrick Buchanan instead of Mr. Gore have a right to air
their grievances. But the problem with the confusing "butterfly"
ballot used in the county is that there is no realistic solution
acceptable to all sides. It is unlikely — and it would be
inadvisable — for a judge to order a new election, or to guess
the intent behind the double-punched ballots. A new election
would be less a replay than a runoff. The more relevant issue is
getting an accurate count of all legitimate ballots cast,
including those where the perforation may not have been cleanly
made. Machines can misread such ballots as unmarked and discard
them. Thousands of ballots like this may not have been counted
in Palm Beach County. Mr. Bush's move to stop the manual vote counting in four
heavily Democratic counties in Florida was wrongly conceived.
The argument of James A. Baker III that hand counting is an
error- prone attempt to "divine" voter intentions is mistaken.
Far from guesswork, the process of examining the ballots in
Florida over the weekend was simply one of trying to see if a
hole had been punched in the ballot. As Warren Christopher noted
for the Democrats, hand counts are lawful in Florida and other
states, including Texas. Mr. Baker sounded as if he was trying
to short-circuit a legitimate effort to make sure that all the
votes were counted, simply because the Bush camp was worried
about the result. The Bush campaign would be on firmer ground if it asked that
deadlines be waived to allow manual vote counting in heavily
Republican districts as well as those that voted for Mr. Gore.
Most recounts end up adding votes to all candidates. It might
even be the fairest solution to have a manual count statewide.
Mr. Baker and Mr. Christopher, both former secretaries of state,
are two of the nation's most experienced diplomats. They ought
to be able to negotiate an agreement that ends the litigation
and leaves the selection of a new president where it belongs at
this late hour — in a careful and accurate count of the votes
already cast by Floridians. There is no reason such an agreement
cannot include a deadline of next weekend for completing the
count, including absentee ballots from overseas that are due no
later than Friday. Certification of the Florida vote totals
should not be made by the state until the manual counting is
completed. During the campaign, Mr. Bush tirelessly repeated his belief
that states should be allowed to determine what is best for
them. It is disingenuous for him to challenge the
constitutionality of a law similar to one his own state adopted.
As the Democrats noted, he availed himself of a hand count in at
least one county already where his operatives felt they could
get a more fair and complete result. With a concerted effort to
count ballots by hand, and agreement between the Bush and Gore
camps to put the national interest above personal and party
interests, Americans can find out who their next president is
before the week is out.
Copyright © 2000 New York Times Company. All rights reserved.
November 13, 2000
