October 10, 2001
UPHOLD LEGISLATIVE PROCESS FOR ANTI-TERRORISM LEGISLATION
From the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Urge House Action on H.R. 2975
- The House Judiciary Committee unanimously approved a bill on a bipartisan basis that seeks to address several critical civil liberties concerns, and most importantly includes a sunset provision for expanded law enforcement authority.
- While the House bill still raises many civil liberties concerns, it reflects a deliberative process and the input of many members of both parties who sought to address law enforcement interests and to safeguard civil liberties.
- The Senate bill does not contain the same civil liberties safeguards.
- Dangerously, the Senate bill would also weaken the authority of state disciplinary bodies to subject federal prosecutors to state ethics rules; this abrogates the McDade-Murtha Law, which was enacted in 1998 with overwhelming bipartisan support in the House of Representatives.
- The Administration is seeking to avoid action on the House proposal arguing instead that the normal legislative process be suspended so that a bill can be passed quickly without consideration of all the issues raised in the course of the House debate.
- Action by the Administration and the leadership over the next few days could prevent consideration of the House measure.
- Contact House Speaker Hastert and urge him to call for a vote on HR 2975, the PATRIOT Act
Hon. J. Dennis Hastert
Speaker of the House
> The democratic process requires consideration of important matters in both the House and Senate
> The House bill contains several critical civil liberties safeguards that are not in the Senate measure
> The House bill reflects careful deliberation of complex issues and bipartisan consensus
> The sunset provision must be preserved
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Back to The Crime Line
Back to The Talk Line