
Cape Cod Times
August 7, 2001
Pardon Nonviolent Drug Dealers
By Sean Gonsalves
"What specific programs would
you propose to cause the have-nots to improve their situation?" - an
interested reader asks out in Seattle.
The so-called war on
drugs is a good jumping off point because it is at that juncture
where race, gender and class relations get entangled in a massive
web of fear and loathing, strangling the spirit of liberty and
egalitarianism woven into the very fabric of this country.
We
are in the midst of an epidemic. Fueled by a widespread (overwhelmingly white) demand for
illicit drugs, the U.S. prison population has reached the
unprecedented mark of two million inmates, making the incarceration
rate in America number one in the industrialized world. Add to that
the many, many more drug users and dealers who are not locked up and
you have a full-blown drug crisis.
I will lay aside the
well-established correlation between low socioeconomic status and
what is commonly called "street crime," and point out the
inescapable fact that (criminal motive notwithstanding) relying on
incarceration to control the drug crisis has severe social costs;
not the least of which is the acceleration of community breakdown
already afflicting the poor and vulnerable.
In a campaign
speech called "Armies of Compassion," President Bush - being the
soother of racial tensions that he is - noted that the prison
population has tripled over the last 15 years. This incarceration
orgy, he said in one of the biggest understatements of the new
millennium, poses "a problem." With so many people in jail, there
are now 1.3 million children in America with one or both of their
parents behind bars.
Nothing less than an expansion of social
consciousness will do. It's a tall order. And there is only so much
you can convey in a single column. So let me get to it, realizing
that anything short of a tome will not adequately address the
complex issues raised here. At the very least, this will be one tiny
testimony, a thumbnail sketch, of an alternative vision.
I
propose that we grant a one-time pardon to imprisoned drug dealers
who have not been convicted of serious violent felonies on the
condition that they complete a long-term drug treatment program (if
appropriate) and also graduate from a highly structured business
apprenticeship under the close supervision of probation
officers.
This would have to be a tremendous collaborative
effort between federal and state government, and private business
interests - in which business executives mentor pardoned drug
dealers.
At the end of the apprenticeship the ex-dealer would
have one of three options. 1.) Apply for a guaranteed,
government-funded, no- or low-interest loan to try his hand at legal
entrepreneurship; 2.) Prove he (or she) has a job, which would
ideally be a job tied to the business organization that provided the
apprenticeship; or 3.) Go directly to jail. Do not pass 'Go.' Do not
collect the pardon.
On the street-end of things, black (and
white) churches and mosques could set up a network of - call them, I
don't know - Cain is Able Sanctuaries, where drug dealers who wish
to "get out the game" and enter the apprenticeship program can do so
without fear of being arrested and prosecuted.
These human
redemption centers would have to be open for a limited-time only, of
course, so as to not completely undermine the rule of law.
At
the same time, we would have to strengthen community-policing
efforts - ranging from building police substations in areas where
there are high crime rates to forming neighborhood watch groups.
This would be done in conjunction with a new focus on big-time drug
traffickers, not small-time peddlers, which would require people
like Ollie North and the late William Casey to stop chumming it up
with the likes of Manuel Noriega and other international drug
lords.
Decriminalizing marijuana use while maintaining
criminal sanctions for hard-core drugs like cocaine and heroin might
also be a facet of this initiative.
Prisons would, no doubt,
need to be restructured so that, for starters, violent offenders are
held in separate institutions than nonviolent offenders. This would
be accompanied by a renewed emphasis on treatment for inmates with
addiction problems and job training.
Prisoners would be
responsible to feed themselves through agricultural and farm work.
Other in-prison employment could be created where inmates would have
to pay for room and board (on some sliding income-based scale) as
well as pay restitution to their victims.
Those who opted not
to partake in that program would not be released from jail until
they could demonstrate to a citizen-elected parole board they were
ready to re-enter society as a proverbial productive
citizen.
Anything is possible. The Chicago Cubs are in first
place in the NL central division and the Red Sox have a shot at the
AL pennant this year. OK, well, maybe that's a little extreme but as
Kierkegaard said: Hope is the passion for what is possible. Are you
hopeful? I am.
Sean Gonsalves is a Cape Cod Times staff writer and syndicated columinist.
Copyright © 2001, Cape Cod Times Company. All rights reserved.
saved from url: http://www.capecodonline.com/cctimes/edits/seang.htm
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
