Reuters
July 24, 2001


LAPD Whistle-Blower Released to Secret Location


By Jill Serjeant

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -- The whistle-blower in a massive police corruption scandal was released from prison on parole to a secret location on Tuesday, fearing for his safety after alleging that he and fellow officers framed, beat, and even shot innocent people.

Prison officials said former Los Angeles Police Department () officer Rafael Perez, 31, was taken to an undisclosed location after a judge ordered his early release on Monday from a five year term for stealing cocaine from a police evidence locker.

``Being a former Los Angeles police officer, I think people recognize that his life could be in danger and so we're going to ensure that his release is quiet and incognito,'' said Russ Heimerich of the California Department of Corrections.

Following the charges against him in September 1999, Perez began telling prosecutors of a string of alleged misdeeds by police in his Rampart division -- home to Los Angeles' mostly poor, Hispanic immigrants.

His allegations led to ongoing investigations of scores of other officers, the overturning of more than 100 criminal convictions and a bill of hundreds of millions of dollars to the city in legal and settlement costs.

Perez had served almost three years of his five year term when Superior Court Judge Robert Perry ordered his early release, saying the information he had provided was ''extraordinary in its scope.'' Perry said that Perez could, if he wished, serve out his parole time outside California.

Prosecutors failed on Monday to get an appeals panel to put the release of Perez on hold until they can file a formal appeal. They still intend to proceed with that appeal, arguing that the judge overstepped his authority.

CONCERNS ABOUT SAFETY

Perez's lawyer, Winston Kevin McKesson, told reporters that the former cop had turned to religion during his jail time and wanted to be a productive member of society.

But McKesson added; ``He certainly has concerns about his safety. He doesn't know who would want to take a potshot at him.''

Scores of prisoners, many of them gang members, have been released because their convictions were deemed insecure after Perez's revelations.

But the probe into officer corruption at Rampart has been slow moving and only a handful of officers have been brought to trial so far. They include Perez's former partner, Nino Durden, who has admitted that he and Perez shot an unarmed man during a gang raid, leaving him paralyzed from the waist down, and then planted a gun on him.

Three other Rampart officers found guilty in November of fabricating charges against gang members had their convictions overturned a month later on the grounds of jury error and insufficient evidence. A further seven officers have been charged and are awaiting trial.

Los Angeles police and city officials agreed reluctantly last year to submit to federal oversight of the police force, including measures to weed out rogue officers, end racial profiling and strengthen civilian control of the police.

The so-called federal consent decree followed a four year probe of the Los Angeles Police Department by the U.S. Justice Department which alleged a ``pattern or practice'' of civil rights abuses over several years.

Copyright © 2001. Reuters. All rights reserved.

saved from url: http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010724/ts/crime_police_dc_1.html

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Back to The Crime Line

Back to The Talk Line