
New York Times Editorial Rule of Law in Florida The unanimous ruling by the Florida Supreme Court to allow the hand counting of votes to
resume in Palm Beach County brought a note of order and reason
to the last act of the presidential election. Today, in a State
Circuit Court in Tallahassee, Judge Terry P. Lewis needs to put
teeth in the State Supreme Court ruling by directing Katherine
Harris, the secretary of state, to accept the hand counts from
Palm Beach and other disputed counties before she certifies the
statewide vote that will determine the next president. Only another forceful court action will keep Ms. Harris from
single-handedly manipulating the decision in Florida. Earlier
this week, Judge Lewis ordered her not to use her powers
arbitrarily. She immediately defied that ruling by declaring
that she would not accept any late hand-counted votes. Even as
those counts proceeded under the authority of the State Supreme
Court, Ms. Harris's lawyers declared yesterday that she would
certify the machine-counted vote on Saturday if she had the
authority. The state and federal judiciary cannot tolerate such defiance
on a matter of paramount national importance. Today, Judge Lewis
must take away Ms. Harris's powers to bring the election to a
premature end in order to claim the election for a candidate,
Gov. George W. Bush, for whom she worked as a state campaign
co-chairwoman. The need for court supervision of the final count between Mr.
Bush and Vice President Al Gore goes beyond curbing the hubris
of a minor state officeholder placed by fate at the hinge of
history. Florida's justices, as well as the state and federal
jurists handling other aspects of the case, have a clear legal
foundation. Florida law is built around protecting "the voter's
intent." That intent cannot be known unless all ballots are
counted under legislation that specifically recognizes hand
counts as the ultimate level of accuracy. The right to vote is the most fundamental civil right, and
judges who act decisively to protect the franchise are not
meddling in the political process. They are protecting it in
much the same way that leading jurists of the 1960's, like Frank
M. Johnson Jr., the Alabama federal judge, did with powerful
rulings that curbed biased, overreaching local officials. In
this case, the motives are not racial. But Secretary of State
Harris is acting with obvious partisan motives to place a a
choke hold on the democratic process in the state of Florida. By
that act, she is interfering with the rights of millions of
Americans to see the contest between Mr. Bush and Mr. Gore
decided by the best count available under imperfect
circumstances. The Florida Supreme Court's ruling yesterday was,
astonishingly, the fourth rebuke to Ms. Harris and the Bush
lawyers in as many days. On Monday, a federal judge denied the
Bush campaign's request to block the disputed hand-counted
votes. On Tuesday, Judge Lewis ruled that Ms. Harris was wrong
to say that she was required to ignore any late hand- counted
returns except when the delay was caused by an act of God. On
Wednesday the Florida Supreme Court denied Ms. Harris's request
to block the hand counts. Yesterday's ruling rejected the
reasoning of Ms. Harris's office that only a mechanical
breakdown of the voting machines could justify the recount. The
justices upheld the authority of Palm Beach County — and by
extension other counties — to proceed with the manual
tabulations. The Bush strategy is obvious. The governor's aides do not
want to risk a complete statewide count. That is the reason Mr.
Bush refused Mr. Gore's offer on Wednesday for both of them to
forgo future litigation in exchange for a definitive recount. In
his brief television speech on Wednesday night, Mr. Bush
belittled the accuracy and fairness of hand counts. But he
repeatedly ignores the fact that hand counts are used in his own
state and that voluntary hand counts in several Florida counties
actually increased his vote. Events in Florida this week add up to this. After a slow
start, the courts are now acting properly to draw fair rules for
the vote count at a time when Ms. Harris has been making up new
rules on the run through the purposeful misinterpretation of
state law. If the pattern of principled court rulings continues
today, the hand counts will produce a reliable vote and a
presidency that will not have a cloud over it when claimed by
either Mr. Bush or Mr. Gore.
Copyright © 2000 New York Times Company. All rights reserved.
November 17, 2000
