New York Times Tainted Justice By Bob Herbert Texas has
always had a brutally peculiar take on what constitutes justice. A
veteran Dallas defense lawyer, reminiscing last year, said, "At one
point, with a black-on-black murder, you could get it dismissed if
the defendant would pay funeral expenses." A prominent judge, looking back to his days as a prosecutor in
the 1950's, remembered an angry boss telling him, "If you ever put
another nigger on a jury, you're fired." A judge in Harris County, reacting to complaints about a defense
lawyer sleeping during a capital murder trial, acknowledged that
defendants were entitled to a lawyer, but added, "The Constitution
doesn't say the lawyer has to be awake." Those quotes were drawn from a major study last year of the death
penalty in Texas. The whole world knows that Texas has a fetish for
executing people. Nothing stops the Lone Star Executioner. There may
be uncertainty as to guilt. The condemned may be mentally retarded.
The defense lawyer may have been drunk or drug-addicted or wildly
incompetent. The jury may have been rabidly racist. No matter. The
conveyor belt of death in Huntsville, the state's execution
headquarters, maintains its steady, mindless pace. Napoleon Beazley is to be placed upon that belt next week. The
crime he was convicted of was bad enough, for sure. He killed a man
in cold blood, shot at the man's wife and stole their car. But the death penalty is always problematic. And there are some
issues in the Beazley case that are very troubling. The victim's son
is a federal judge from Virginia who forged a remarkably close
relationship with the prosecution as it built its case for the death
of Mr. Beazley. All of the jurors, like the prosecutors and the judge, were
white. Mr. Beazley is black. One of the jurors was the president of
the United Daughters of the Confederacy. Another juror, when
contacted by a defense investigator during the appeals process, was
heard to say, "The nigger got what he deserved." That juror's wife
gave the defense team an affidavit that said her husband was
"racially prejudiced" and that she found it difficult to believe he
could have "set his prejudice aside" for Mr. Beazley's trial. Mr. Beazley's lawyer, Walter Long, said the juror was an
appliance repairman who, according to a co-worker, would refuse to
work on appliances brought in by black customers. It's hard to imagine how a fair trial could have been harvested
from such bitterly racist soil. That's Texas for you. The death- penalty system in the foremost
death- penalty state in the U.S. is monumentally racist. When a
black person kills a white person in Texas, authorities are quick to
put the machinery of capital punishment in gear. And, as in the
Beazley case, black people are routinely excluded from the judgment
process. But it's a different story when a white person kills a
black person. The death penalty study, by the Texas Defender
Service, which represents indigent inmates on death row, noted that
"Texas has never executed a white person for the murder of a black
person." The study found that "across the state, the loss of non-white
lives is treated less seriously than the loss of white lives." Apart from all of these issues is yet another problem with the
Beazley case. The defendant was a minor — 17 years old — when the
crime was committed in 1994. Most of the countries of the world
prohibit the execution of prisoners who were juveniles when the
offense was committed. According to Amnesty International, "Of the thousands of judicial
executions documented worldwide in the past decade, only 25 have
been of prisoners who were under 18 at the time of the crime. Of
these 25, more than half — 13 — were carried out in the United
States." Seven of those executions were done in Texas. As a society, we should have some sense of the immaturity, the
impulsiveness and the frequently appalling lack of judgment that are
so often part of the teenage years. They are not defenses for
murder. But they are reasons for us to withhold the ultimate
punishment from offenders who were not fully grown, and thus may not
have been fully responsible for all of their actions. Napoleon Beazley's life should be spared. Imprisonment for life
is sufficient. Copyright © 2001. New York Times Company. All rights reserved. saved from url: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/06/opinion/06HERB.html
August 6, 2001
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
