Detroit Free Press Editorial
September 23, 2001
On Wiretaps: Nation Must Not Set Aside Important Personal Rights So Easily
The fact that the liberal left and the conservative right have found common concern ought to give Congress pause about rushing pell-mell to invade privacy and reduce civil liberties in pursuit of terrorists.
There are surveillance laws that probably should be updated to reflect modern telecommunications and the widespread use of the Internet. There is room to do this within constitutional boundaries. No such authority should be extended without the approval of a judge, and not on the "blank check" basis being sought for search warrants, which amounts to: Just let us look and we'll tell you later what we found.
On matters of such fundamental rights, Congress should not act solely on the pronouncements of Attorney General John Ashcroft about the needs of law enforcement. There's another side -- about the rights of American citizens -- to be heard.
As Benjamin Franklin once observed, "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
The Senate set a risky precedent last week when, without even a committee hearing, it passed a bill to expand federal wiretap authority. If Congress insists on such a fast track, any laws passed in the name of national security and counterterrorism should be stamped with a sunset date, so they may be more appropriately reviewed in a year, hopefully in a less-tense atmosphere.
We'd all like to feel a little more secure in these uncertain times. But that means secure in our fundamental rights, too. Rights surrendered are not easily regained.
Copyright © 2001, Detroit Free Press. All rights reserved.
saved from url: http://www.freep.com/voices/editorials/ewire23_20010923.htm
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Back to The Crime Line
Back to The Talk Line