Dallas Morning News
August 9, 2001


Texas Seeks Death for Mom Accused of Drowning Kids<


By Bruce Nichols

HOUSTON – -- Prosecutors announced Wednesday that they will seek the death penalty for a woman who admitted drowning her five children in a bathtub at home.

But whether Andrea Pia Yates will go to trial depends on a hearing ordered by state District Judge Belinda Hill earlier in the day. It will determine whether Mrs. Yates, 37, is mentally competent to assist in her defense.

District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal made his decision to seek the death penalty after lawyers entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity for Mrs. Yates.

Mr. Rosenthal "believes the citizens of Harris County ought to be able to consider the full range of punishment in this case, including the death penalty," a statement issued by his office said.

Before a trial, Mrs. Yates' mental fitness to understand the proceedings must be decided. Judge Hill said the hearing would be scheduled within two weeks.

Defense lawyers George Parnham and Wendell Odom could not be reached for comment, but no one involved in the case has spoken to reporters since the judge imposed a gag order shortly after the June 20 crime.

The decision was Mr. Rosenthal's highest-profile call since succeeding longtime District Attorney Johnny Holmes in January. Mr. Holmes' willingness to seek the death penalty whenever the law applied made Houston the nation's death penalty capital.

Mr. Rosenthal's approach – let the community decide – appears "similar to that taken by his predecessor," South Texas College of Law professor Catherine Greene Burnett said. Mr. Holmes often answered critics by saying that if people didn't like the law, they should change it.

The decision no doubt will be controversial, experts said.

"Whenever we have cases involving women, I think it changes public perception," Ms. Burnett said. "That renews discussions about the death penalty across the board."

Former prosecutor Rusty Hardin, now in private practice, focused on the five children killed. "This will be unpopular with some people," he said. But "when there's five children involved, a lot of prosecutors would say they have to let the community decide."

South Texas law professor Neil McCabe, a frequent critic of the death penalty, focused on the timing, saying it appeared Mr. Rosenthal might be "trying to make today's news story the death penalty rather than the insanity defense or the judge ordering a competency hearing."

Earlier in the day, Mrs. Yates entered the courtroom for her scheduled arraignment clenching and unclenching her jaw muscles. She never looked at her husband, Russell, a NASA engineer, who sat in the front row.

She was silent and expressionless as her lawyers entered the plea, arguing that she is mentally incapable of participating in court proceedings concerning the drownings.

Prosecutors told Judge Hill that their expert had found Mrs. Yates competent. Defense lawyers said another expert had determined that she is incompetent. The judge said the conflict between experts justifies a hearing before a jury.

A grand jury indicted Mrs. Yates on two capital murder charges. One indictment was issued under a law applying to the killing of a child younger than 6 and cites Mrs. Yates' youngest child, Mary, 6 months, as the victim.

The second indictment comes under a law applying to multiple homicides and names as victims Mrs. Yates' oldest children, Noah, 7, and John, 5.

She also told police that she killed sons Paul, 3, and Luke, 2. Although they weren't listed in indictments, their deaths are expected to come up at her trial.

Her husband said Mrs. Yates had suffered from depression and had been under psychiatric care before the drownings, police said.

The competence question and the insanity defense are separate matters, Mr. McCabe said.

If a jury finds Mrs. Yates mentally unfit to stand trial, the murder trial would be postponed for at least 90 days pending a determination that she has become competent to understand and participate in her defense.

"They have regular time periods for review, and it's up to the judge," Mr. McCabe said. "Doctors say how she's doing, and the judge determines whether she's then competent."

An insanity plea would come into play if and when Mrs. Yates goes to trial.

The question then would be whether Mrs. Yates, though mentally competent to stand trial, was so mentally ill at the time of the crime that she didn't understand that her actions were wrong, said Chris Tritico, a lawyer not involved in the case.

Insanity defenses are rarely successful in Texas, Mr. McCabe said.

"The standard is you've got to show severe mental disease or defect, and you've got to show it resulted in you not knowing right from wrong," he said.

According to information made public in the case, Mrs. Yates told police that she methodically drowned each of her children, chasing down Noah after he escaped briefly. Autopsies found bruises indicating that the children struggled.

"It's a horrific case," Mr. Tritico said. Such actions, however, "don't mean she wasn't suffering from a mental illness that caused her not to understand what she was doing is wrong," he said.

Copyright © 2001. Dallas Morning News. All rights reserved.

saved from url:http://www.dallasnews.com/texas_southwest/439245_yates_09tex.html

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Back to The Crime Line

Back to The Talk Line